- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:09, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Scott Krug (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't seem notable enough for an article. BJackJS talk 19:15, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep United States state legislators are notable; the article needs to be expanded. Thank you-RFD (talk) 19:22, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:59, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:59, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep meets WP:NPOL, first bullet point (state-wide office). Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 21:07, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep - WP:NPOL generally gives notability to US state-level legislators, under the presumption they gain decent coverage, which appears to be true in this case. See [1], [2], [3], etc. He's clearly notable. Hog Farm Bacon 22:03, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:NPOL #1. --TheSandDoctor Talk 04:07, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Passes WP:NPOL as Krug serves as a member of the Wisconsin State Assembly, the state's lower house. Lefcentreright Talk | Contribs | Global 18:20, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep passes WP:NPOL as a a member of the Wisconsin State Assembly.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:03, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Willsome429. Royalbroil 12:54, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Member of the Wisconsin State Assembly. Passes WP:NPLO. --Enos733 (talk) 04:17, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:NPOL and WP:SNOW-close or, if the nominator withdraws and the discussion qualifies for it, close as WP:Speedy keep. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 15:53, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Procedural request for nominator: @BJackJS: Please consider withdrawing this so it can be closed by an un-involved non-administrator as a "speedy keep (non-admin closure)." This will free up administrators for other tasks. Otherwise, either the discussion will be closed early as a snow close by an administrator or it will be closed after the 7th day by an administrator or other experienced editor. This is a request and a recommendation, you are free to ignore it. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 15:53, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per WP:POLITICIAN --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 16:02, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.