The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (X! · talk)  · @178  ·  03:16, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Rainford[edit]

Scott Rainford (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Contested PROD with no reason given and no improvement. Take your pick of reasons for deletion. If I could decipher this into English, it may or may not assert notability. It appears to be copied and pasted from somewhere. Ghits are almost non-existent. Could be a hoax. Doesn't pass WP:BAND. Unsourced. Unverifiable. Wperdue (talk) 04:23, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 05:45, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Looks like a speedy candidate (A7) to me. I42 (talk) 07:28, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, article fails to establish notability per WP:MUSIC.  Esradekan Gibb  ^"Klat" 12:14, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No evidence that WP:MUSIC is met. sparkl_!sm ^hey! 09:03, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.