- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:33, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Scott Rupp Award[edit]
- Scott Rupp Award (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced. Trivial and non-notable. Fails WP:GNG. Also see WP:SPORTCRIT. Full of redlinks and broken templates. Created as part of a large swath of pages by a single user who has since left. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 02:26, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The MVP award of a top professional league of a sport is very clearly notable. And I would note it isn't unsourced. -DJSasso (talk) 16:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:56, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 16:43, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 18:22, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: While logically it seems like it should have an article, I cannot find any sourcing to justify my own opinion and therefore must choose to delete per WP:GNG. GauchoDude (talk) 20:38, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.