The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  05:37, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Yim[edit]

Scott Yim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual known for a single local event. Some coverage, but appears to be all local. ttonyb (talk) 22:44, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not notable. Jim Carmel (talk) 21:19, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Does not satisfy requirements of WP:BIO or WP:GNG  Chzz  ►  03:01, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, what he did is laudable and impressive, but WP:BLP1E would appear to apply here. Only fleeting and localised coverage. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:13, 20 September 2009 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.