The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:44, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scotzine[edit]

Scotzine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

No evidence that this is a notable publication; ^{[Check Google hits]} Google search results in 183 pages, mostly directory entries and self-submissions. Contested prod. ... discospinster _talk 17:23, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete no third-party sourcing, written like an advertisement (ex: "Now that Scotzine is gradually building up we are always on the look out for new members to volunteer there services and thankfully we have built up a small team that carry out various tasks, such as: Programming, Design, Photography and Research."), absolutely no evidence of any notability.--Mbc362 17:44, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.