The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep but can you please add some information to the article because it is borderline speedy for lack of content. JForget 22:42, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seithigal[edit]

Seithigal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject that the article has not meet the requirements of notability, it fails WP:CORP. ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 11:01, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, lifebaka++ 11:24, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Verifiable TV channel presumably watched by millions of people, given India's population. Pburka (talk) 14:56, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- -SpacemanSpiff^{Calvin‡Hobbes} 00:13, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. It's even covered by the BBC in addition to other Indian news outlets. -SpacemanSpiff^{Calvin‡Hobbes} 00:17, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.