The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:39, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Service record of Reinhard Heydrich

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An unneeded content fork & indiscriminate collection of information; key milestones of the subject's career are already included in the main article. Appears to be mostly WP:OR. Created by Special:Contributions/OberRanks currently site-banned for fabricating content and sources. For more info, please see ANI:OberRanks_and_fabricated_sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:11, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete cf: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Service record of Heinrich Himmler. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:18, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Apparently created from the main article and expanded with much unsourced information. There is much in this article which does not relate to its subject, allegedly the collection of official SS documents maintained at the SS Personnel Main Office in Berlin from 1934 until the fall of Nazi Germany in 1945 (first sentence). The chapter on possible late war assignments even refers to Documents recovered from Heinrich Himmler's personal journals, as well as draft orders from the SS-Hauptamt, and thus demonstrates, that the subject is not Heydrich's actual service record, but Heydrich himself. Therefore the article falls under WP:COATRACK and WP:POVFORK.--Assayer (talk) 11:59, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I have thought about it further and agree with deletion. For one, I don't care to wade through it and try to save parts (and RS cite them), which do pertain to his service record and awards for a valid sub-article. And it is mostly covered in the main GA article. I will look through it briefly (later) to see what may be transferred, if anything, into the main article when I can before it is deleted. Of course for anything I may transfer, I will find RS cites to use. Kierzek (talk) 18:20, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this is a POV fork of Reinhard Heydrich by an author with a history of misrepresenting sources. I don't think any of the material in this version of the article needs to be merged back, but could be convinced some of it should be restored. power~enwiki (π, ν) 01:10, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (or Merge with Reinhard Heydrich) -- Heyrich is unquestionably notable, but I am not seeing a bunch of secondary sources devoted to his service record. I would not expect that for any soldier, no matter how notable. --David Tornheim (talk) 07:49, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.