The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)‎ Geschichte (talk) 14:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sex and the Other Man[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:NFO, WP:NFSOURCES and WP:GNG. I found no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. Per WP:NEXIST, the sources have to be “suitable” and none of the sources are suitable or reliable enough. I did a WP:BEFORE and found one suitable and reliable review from TV Guide. Needs one more suitable and reliable review in order to be eligible. The Film Creator (talk) 08:06, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. The Film Creator (talk) 08:06, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Keep. Added sources to the page, including TV Guide mentioned above. See for yourself.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 08:38, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Excellent work, User:Mushy Yank. I speedy withdraw this nomination. The Film Creator (talk) 08:47, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.