The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-25 05:38Z

Sex ant toys[edit]

Sex ant toys (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This article has a lot of sources, but none of them meet WP:RS. It also appears to fail WP:CRYSTAL. Because of the presence of sources, I'm giving this article the dignity of an AfD, but it may even be a speedy candidate. N Shar 06:55, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete no claims of notability. MLA 07:05, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete No claims of notability. TJ Spyke 07:35, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Well, it's posted on the Official Site of the band, in the official site of their music label, and I work for Apple: its confirmed, what else do you want? Eddy Cue 08:34, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • They have to be discussed by multiple non-trivial third party sites, all i'm seeing are things like MySpace and user submitted press releases. The music label appears to be non-notable (among other things, doesn't even have a Wikipedia page). This isn't about whether they exists, it's whether they are notable or not. They also seem to fail WP:MUSIC. TJ Spyke 08:44, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • It's notable here: | iTunes Music Store On the label of every single album and the website link within iTunes. Manny Vidal NYC 09:06, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • Comment. Product listings are not in-depth (or, to use the older terminology, "non-trivial") because they contain little more information than the name. The "official site of the band" is not independent of the subject. We don't doubt the existence of the band; we doubt its notability. (Please note that very few bands are notable before they have released records.) --N Shar 18:10, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep It's official and notable. Pia Watson 09:32, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, and when (if) this record comes out and gets some independent reviews, then re-create the article. Whoever does, make sure to use a spell-checker. --UsaSatsui 16:50, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:MUSIC as pointed out before... -- Ben 20:30, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as failing WP:MUSIC. Two albums on notable labels, national tours, stuff like that... when they've achieved those, then an article may be supportable. Tony Fox (arf!) 21:15, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. A delete vote here consisted only of a personal attack and was was removed. --N Shar 05:49, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• keep per Eddy Cue reasonsOo7565 05:53, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable band has no independent reliable sources to show notability. Edison 06:27, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Independent label is a reliable source Pili Busy 10:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep All Music clearly states about the album and the band. All MusicPia Watson 10:35, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Allmusic has the band down as having one album here. The album hasn't been released yet. WP:BAND number 4 is not satisfied... it asks for two or more released albums. -- Ben 15:40, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not notable. Ramduke — Ramduke (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.