The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:43, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SgCarMart[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Two minor awards, one of which cannot be verified, is not enough to make a company notable. I can't find enough to substantiate notability per WP:CORPDEPTH. The company is a client of a web marketing company that has its own article currently nominated for deletion here. Stalwart111 00:49, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Same as Conversion Hub and previously deleted Asia Food Recipe, these companies are intermingled and sourced with nothing but press releases. There is no WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS to establish WP:GNG. The few passing mentions that they do have is not enough for WP:CORPDEPTH and article should be deleted as not meeting notability guidelines. --FoolMeOnce2Times (talk) 15:14, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.