The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 05:14, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Both sources appear to be unreliable, and contradictory. Delete for lack of notability and reliable sources. StAnselm (talk) 03:55, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: as per DustFormsWords.Farhikht (talk) 12:07, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.