The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (non-admin closure), I feel consensus plus my own opinion says to merge with Waterside Theatre so, close and merge I shall Fr33kman^{talk APW} 23:54, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shakespearience[edit]

non-notable Linkboyz (talk) 15:10, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is a former tourist attraction than ran for a relatively short period. It is reasonable to keep the Waterside Theatre page as that still exists and has been around much longer.

Merge - ok with a merge into Waterside Theatre but a google news search does seem to support WP:N. Most articles are subscription based so it could run into verifiability issues. It seems to be a fairly common name used for a Shakespeare education event. Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 16:38, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The google news search only has about 10 items. The old ones are adverts or announcements for events when the tourist attraction was in business. The recent ones are about this becoming a former tourist attraction. Linkboyz (talk) 17:04, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:10, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.