The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:07, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shards of Dalaya[edit]

Unnotable Everquest emulation server. First few pages of Google web search are empty of anything except blogs, forums, and torrents, and Google books, news, and scholar are all empty. Likely, suitable sources cannot be found. lifebaka++ 13:23, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I declined the prod on this because it had previously been deleted via prod and wasn't eligible, then got busy IRL and didn't have time to nominate. No reliable sources found, and while I'm prepared to be convinced otherwise, I don't see that it even merits redirecting to somewhere in the Everquest family. (BTW thanks for handling the nomination LB) Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 13:29, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 13:44, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Both references link to the official website. No results on Google News/Scholar/Books. More specific Google searches (e.g. "Shards of Dalaya" review Everquest -showthread -site:*forums*, 88 results) show no signs of notability. — Rankiri (talk) 14:41, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per Rankiri. Iowateen (talk) 20:21, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: violates WP:NOTE, WP:V, and WP:ADS. Andyo2000 (talk) 05:00, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.