The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Sheikh Jamal Dhanmondi Club. What to move over is an editorial discussion beyond the scope of AfD, but there seems to be consensus that policy dictates that stats not be included. (non-admin closure) ansh 666 00:04, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sheikh Jamal Dhanmondi Club in Asian Football[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod with no reason given. Could be a notable topic in the future but at the moment the club have played only a couple of games in continental football. No need at the moment for a fork for this. Fenix down (talk) 11:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 13:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 13:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Deletion appears extreme. The club is in its sixth season, even if its participation in AFC events has been limited so far. If the article is not thought to stand on its own, is there no viable merge target? Sheikh Jamal Dhanmondi Club, perhaps? Shouldn't this be a merge discussion on the article talk page rather than an AfD? --Worldbruce (talk) 15:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NOTSTATS it would not be appropriate to merge to the main club article as we do not keep records of every match played there (and certainly not for qualifying rounds - this is a club who have not yet participated in competition proper at a continental level. Additionally, given that there is nothing on their two continental matches in the main club article a redirect at the moment would not make sense. There is nothing at the moment contained in this article that is not word for word covered at 2016 AFC Cup, but given that is a single season article redirecting from a more general article would also not make sense. Fenix down (talk) 08:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to a section on the main page similar to Bradford City A.F.C. in European football, and remove most of the details per NOTSTATS. Giant Snowman 18:16, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:43, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - per GiantSnowman's argument. Inter&anthro (talk) 16:13, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I'm happy to merge as consensus if de-statted. Fenix down (talk) 17:14, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:23, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:23, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:23, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 16:51, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - don't we have a merge consensus here? Fenix down (talk) 16:53, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.