The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Spartaz ^Humbug! 19:21, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shiftboard[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find significant coverage for this org; I see some passing mentions, but no articles actually about the subject - other than press-release things that are not independent of the source. Chzz ► 22:11, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Sources in article appear sufficient to establish notability. ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:24, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Very weak keep per ChildofMidnight. The sources seem to be grabbing at straws, but together they generate a slight case for notability. Them From Space 23:36, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Could you please clarify which sources you feel demonstrate significant coverage? Chzz ► 22:42, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:56, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.