The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. SoWhy 09:58, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shipyourenemiesglitter.com[edit]

Shipyourenemiesglitter.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable company which was sold for $85,000. CelenaSkaggs (talk) 17:22, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:44, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• comment: I'm the shmendrik who started the article. Whatever the outcome of this AfD is, it's OK with me. --Shirt58 (talk) 12:00, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Coverage seems sensationalist, and more importantly the subject company fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:WEB.--SamHolt6 (talk) 04:10, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep – Passes WP:GNG per a review of available sources, which are copious. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:04, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Seems to meet WP:GNG per the sources in the article and per the above search. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 09:39, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.