The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. I have to take issue with Isarra's claim that WP:N does not really apply. It most certainly does apply, in particular WP:ENTERTAINER is explicitly indicated as the relevant guideline by WP:ATHLETE. However, no argument was advanced that this article does not meet that guideline. The shortness of their existence is not an argument based in policy. Length of the period of notability is not one of the guideline criteria. Spinning Spark 01:41, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ShoMiz[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A controversial article. ShoMiz won the unified tag team titles and defend it in WM, but the tag team lived for 3 months only. I think that is is a short lived tag team that we can redirect to the articles of the wrestlers. HHH Pedrigree (talk) 00:07, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:11, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Boom. GaryColemanFan (talk) 20:54, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I disagreed entirely with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Boom and I still do now. Winning a title doesn't make a team notable. They need a credible run with enough information to warrant a subject. Most of the information in this article fits in their individual articles. In fact, most of the information is repeated anyway in those articles which makes ShoMiz a perfect example of cruft. It needs to go. Feedback ^☎ 16:44, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Keeper | 76 02:37, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - well-covered, won an apparently somewhat important thingy, and while WP:N doesn't entirely apply to this sort of thing there's probably enough here to merit keeping especially on account of the winningness. If anyone searches for 'showmiz' they'll probably be wanting this instead of an article on one or the other of the guys regardless. -— Isarra ༆ 19:38, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.