The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 22:37, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. Highly POV/PEACOCK, no external sourcing to show why subject is notable.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 03:52, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: almost all web refs trace it's origin to wikipedia. No other RS found. --Redtigerxyz (talk) 04:29, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable to anyone except his followers.Yobmod (talk) 14:21, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per Redtigerxyz. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 02:44, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.