The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. as a WP:SOFTDELETE Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:52, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shriek Metal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reference exists that shows that this term has any sort of widespread use. Searching for this term turns up no results in any other source, and thus the article seems to fall under WP:Neologism. Proposed Deletion was removed by article's creator, so I brought it here for a consensus. Rorshacma (talk) 08:29, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Per nom. No sources, all of the bands that it alludes to falling until this supposed genre either had their article's deleted, or don't even list the genre. WP:NOTNEO applies as well. Sergecross73 msg me 19:31, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.