- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 15:16, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Siamsinpawlpi[edit]
- Siamsinpawlpi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This organization does not appear to meet general notability guidelines. Steps were taken WP:BEFORE this nomination to locate non-trivial coverage from reliable third party publications, but were not successful. As with all of my nominations, please leave me a message on my talk page should appropriate sourcing be located. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 17:42, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - There simply doesn't seem to be any possibility of improvement, a search at News found results for other things with that name and Books found nothing useful aside from this (the continuing page is not available). The article is not very neat so details are hard to use to expand the searches. SwisterTwister talk 06:14, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Dai Pritchard (talk) 08:07, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:36, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.