The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:33, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Silvia Simondini (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO jps (talk) 16:52, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete due to lack of coverage in reliable, independent sources. Cullen328 (talk) 18:27, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:47, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:47, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: poorly sourced BLP. No indication that any sources "address the subject directly in detail", so no "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 08:11, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Hrafn, no reliable independent sources apparent. - LuckyLouie (talk) 18:12, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No reliable sources cited in article, and none found via google search. LK (talk) 07:45, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.