The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, a clear consensus for delete following relisting. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:18, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Simone Lucchesi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable strength and conditioning coach for American pro soccer team. Subject does not satisfy the specific notability guideline for association football/soccer players, managers and coaches per WP:NFOOTY, nor the general notability guidelines per WP:GNG with significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable, secondary sources. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 12:10, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Association football-related deletion discussions. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 12:15, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 12:15, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 12:15, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 12:15, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States-related deletion discussions. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 12:15, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:13, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 08:54, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 08:56, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG JMHamo (talk) 11:35, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--Donniediamond (talk) 13:39, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom fails WP:SIGCOV.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:03, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - has held a position not considered inherently notable. no indication of sufficient significant coverage of his career to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 12:34, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
*Delete - Fails WP:GNG: no evidence of notability. - tucoxn\^talk 14:22, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.