The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. m.o.p 18:30, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Simone Otis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable makeup artist. page created by management agency Gaijin42 (talk) 17:15, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete again, passing mentions don't make notability, PR agency creating articles without regard to policy. Dennis Brown (talk) 17:19, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong delete Per Dennis Brown, non-notable per WP:BIO ukexpat (talk) 18:57, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Mostly mentioned on blog posts or credits for covers. Dougbremner (talk) 20:32, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I'm forced to agree, there's no indication of notability as per our policies. Sources that contradict this would be welcome, of course - but I can't find any. UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 14:49, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.