The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 00:42, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Simplelinux[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable per WP:GNG, one of a thousand Linux distributions that does not assert notability, unreferenced, no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Evident WP:Conflict of interest by creator [1]. Prod contested by creator. MuffledThud (talk) 16:23, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. —MuffledThud (talk) 16:24, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —MuffledThud (talk) 16:24, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No indication of notability, and there are no sources that I can find. This almost falls under WP:CSD#A7 as web content with no assertion of notability. I'm also bothered by the WP:COI here, considering that the official site has a link to the wikipedia article only 2 weeks after the WP article was created. Wikipedia is not for promotion. Joshua Scott (talk) 16:36, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No independent coverage. Nothing in google books or news archive. Pcap ping 16:38, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no indication that this complies with Wikipedia's notability requirements. It isn't even listed on DistroWatch - Ahunt (talk) 13:47, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.