The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 19:03, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sinardea[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication this is real. FunkMonk (talk) 03:52, 25 February 2014 (UTC) FunkMonk (talk) 03:52, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Completely unsourced, and I can't find any sources to add. Other than what appears to be a mirror of this article at this page, which is actually a dead link with no archive, I can't find this genus covered anywhere. —Josh3580_talk/hist 08:03, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arbaxoceras. Same kind of article. Burmeister (talk) 12:29, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No mention in WP:RS. -- 101.119.14.121 (talk) 23:14, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.