The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per WP:SNOW. Nick-D (talk) 01:02, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sir Bourgian Defense Forces[edit]

Sir Bourgian Defense Forces (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

I don't know quite what to make of this, but let's start with no significant coverage in independent reliable sources which would confirm notability. the skomorokh 19:27, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong / Speedy Delete- This article must be a joke, "Sir Bourgian" only has 5 hits on google (4 of them are wikipedia article itself. BritishWatcher (talk) 19:36, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete I have never heard of this organization before. I agree that it must be a joke. TopGearFreak ^Talk 20:01, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as a likely hoax - none of the proper nouns here even yield good hits. Looks like a copy of another article, but I can't find where it might have come from. Bfigura ^(talk) 20:28, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• The logos are from Romanian Land Forces and Estonian Defence League, but I think (from looking at the article history) it was written as a separate article, not copied from one of those, as it was created as a short, unwikified article then expanded. —Snigbrook 23:02, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete hoax. Icewedge (talk) 20:28, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Is boolsheet. Delete. X MarX the Spot (talk) 00:09, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.