The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Addhoc (talk) 23:59, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sitesled[edit]

Sitesled (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Article is contentless stub that is a short description of services provided. No sources provided in the article. Fails WP:V and WP:CORP. BJ^Talk 00:23, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Advert for a non notable company. Nuttah (talk) 08:42, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. docboat (talk) 14:31, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Delete - it's not overwhelmingly advert-like, however there is a lack of a good number of reliable sources, verifying the claims. May also fail business guidelines as stated in the nomination. Rt. 14:50, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I don't think this passes corp either, and no assertion of notability exists. I would have tried to speedy it if I had found it first. Pharmboy (talk) 21:52, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It seems to be an advert for a company that seems non-notable. Jhfireboy Talk 22:07, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This is an advertisement (spam) plain and simple. (jarbarf) (talk) 05:38, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.