The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:48, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sivakarthikeyan[edit]

Sivakarthikeyan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability and the Article resembles a fan site. Pearll's Sun^TALK 04:00, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:17, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have added this cause this page doesn't resemble and article but looks like a fan site, the person for who the page has been created fails notability, he has acted in a movie and is a television anchor, the page is being filled with the shows he has taken part and sure that list is going to increase. Moreover most parts in the article comes from his fan site and from nowhere else. So this person fails Notability. Pearll's Sun^TALK 23:10, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Highly notable actor. There are secondary sources in the article. I have added two more. Please do a Google search before you nominate for AfD --Anbu121 (talk me) 17:43, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• • Well, I've got nothing personal against him but highly notable? i doubt that. yes i did Google, we cant add everything from Google, I still strongly think that the article resembles a fan site and not a wiki kind. I did thought about editing before bringing to AfD, but that leaves the article with nothing except the header. Pearll's Sun^TALK 05:47, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am unable to understand what you mean by "article resembles a fan site". The article is written in a completely neutral point of view. If the list of movies and TV shows is what catches you eyes, it is present is almost every actor's page, even in GAs and FAs. Four articles in National newspapers exclusively about him - what else do you think is needed for notability? --Anbu121 (talk me) 07:37, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't find neutrality in this article, it does resemble a fan site otherwise i wouldn't have brought it to the AfD. Pearll's Sun^TALK 16:38, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Can you please explain which part of the article you find not neutral. By the way, neutrality is not a valid reason for bringing it to AfD. --Anbu121 (talk me) 02:31, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please read the above, I'm sure it gives the answer.I standby it. Pearll's Sun^TALK 02:39, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

English:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tamil: (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• • Well, most of the articles tone resembles a fan site and not a wikipedia type. it seems that you are interested in the article, if the article is improved then im sure this entry can be withdraw from the AFD. Pearll's Sun^TALK 08:35, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I am unable to read the Tamil language sources,[1] but through use of Google translate in addition to the available English language sources, indicate a meeting of WP:GNG and thus WP:PEOPLE.[2][3] Article's tone and sourcing is addressable and the article improvable. Kudos to User:Anbu121. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:46, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for your vote. There were tags on this article since last year and only attempt to remove tags took place but no improvements happened. Glad to hear that the article meets the WP:GNG. If someone improves the article and its tone then sure im happy about it. Pearll's Sun^TALK 08:35, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: A highly notabable. I'm sure his next film 3 (film), will outreach his notability. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 17:02, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: He is a Highly notable, honored actor, With Four Films on breakthrough through whole 2013. He's got great talent and is a good inspiration. The Wiki about him is totally neutral. Fan sites and Wiki has the same information because it is the real information on him. Just because there is same information on the actor, we can't provide fake information so Wiki seems apart from Fan sites. And also this Wiki about him does not look like a Fan site to me in any manner. To me, it looks like a useful source of Information on the Actor, Siva karthikeyan.-- User:Lina Trinity TALK 04.00, 16 April 2014.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.