The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 22:57, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If the name is as rare as the article claims, then establishing notability would require extraordinary evidence. Yet even the author admits to a dearth of sources. —Psychonaut (talk) 17:36, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.