The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 18:15, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Slow Money[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Slow Money (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I think that this company's Wikipedia page should be deleted. I was trying to read through the references to get more information on this company and to improve the article, but most of the references either talk about a book, are the website of this non-profit, or are some other website that isn't a newspaper. There is one newspaper that talks about this company (the Wall Street Journal) that's in the references. The Slow Money company's reach is small and it doesn't get a lot of newspapers writing about the company, even if I google the company. I don't believe this company is important enough to be on Wikipedia. Ghost of Kiev (talk) 17:57, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 18:24, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
More