The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. BD2412T 00:21, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
Speedy Delete Deleted once, brought back as a dicdef since they apparently figured out that a nn band article can be speedied but a neologism dicdef article can't. "A" for effort, I guess, but should really be speedied again. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 23:15, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Clever. And amusing. Speedy delete. -- MarcoTolo 23:35, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as a neologism. Aplomado - UTC 23:37, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Arbusto 02:36, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete at any velocity per above comments, although faster is better. -- Saberwyn 06:06, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Starblind. Can't see a speedy category that this meets, regrettably. Stifle (talk) 12:47, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.