The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:51, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a dictionary; this is a dicdef, not to mention a fairly incoherent and inaccurate one.Walton monarchist89 18:17, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No salvagealbe content, possibly transwiki to Wiktionary? RHBTalk - Edits 18:20, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with no transwiki. As a colloquialism, it's hard to pinpoint an etymology on the term, but the entry's etymology sounds like it was just made up as an off-the-cuff idea - ergo my !vote to not transwiki. --Dennisthe2 18:23, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete Completely unverifiable, no sources, probably just made up on the spot. Yeah. GhostPirate 18:26, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.