- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:20, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Smita Saravade[edit]
- Smita Saravade (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG ( One Source The Times of India [1] ) PravinGanechari (talk) 22:26, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- If there are more sources in other languages, please provide them. ZanciD (talk) 17:03, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Taking Out The Trash (talk) 21:06, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: On researching the movies, I got that she worked in many notable films as a significant role. Contributor008 (talk) 08:53, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi , Source has to be given, just "keep" saying will not work. I myself have tried to find the source in Kannada, Marathi, Konkani, Hindi and English for a month. PravinGanechari (talk) 05:17, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. There are opinions to Keep this article but no reliable sources brought to the discussion yet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:38, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Except for the sources in the article I could not find more sources. In this link [2] she was only mentioned and is not significant coverage. Fails WP:SIGCOV. I am not sure she has had significant role in film to know she passes WP:NACTOR or not. ZanciD (talk) 17:01, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: lacks any sources with significant coverage to suggest notability. ––FormalDude (talk) 02:02, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV. Without usable sources that discuss her work, not clear she passes WP:NACTRESS either.4meter4 (talk) 17:04, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.