- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Randykitty (talk) 15:13, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Smokeasac (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Most of Smokeasca's coverage seems to be inherited from the fact he produced and wrote for Lil Peep. Either way seems to be a case of lacking WP:SIGCOV and certainly doesn't satisfy WP:NBIO either in its current state or based on a search of sources >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 23:30, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:14, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Do the Billboard piece and the NYT article in the article not count? I pulled up the Billboard one in Google and was going to cite it here but it's already been used. This in GQ [1]. Not substantial coverage but enough put together to !keep ? Oaktree b (talk) 23:19, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:21, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep based on my source analysis above, and seemingly lack of anyone else's opinion in the debate. Oaktree b (talk) 14:03, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.