The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deleted, obviously useless content with clear (and early) consensus to delete. Friday (talk) 01:24, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Snippy[edit]

Dictionary definition; also unverifiable (See WP:V). Chick Bowen 00:01, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy as nn-bio, tagged as such  RasputinAXP  _{talk contribs} 00:16, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's not about a real person, but rather a type of person. That speedy criteria is inapplicable. Superm401 | Talk 00:38, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - slang. 147.70.242.21 00:21, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete. Childish prank/hoax. Ifnord 00:22, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hoax is not a speedy criteria either. Superm401 | Talk 00:38, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Normal Delete. Unverifiable and apparently original research. Also a dictdef. Superm401 | Talk 00:37, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. In-joke. I think it is about a real person, a specific one. Not speedy though. rodii 01:14, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.