The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:46, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Snupps[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG. Very little coverage anywhere - nothing significant. A couple of articles (Techcrunch and Telegraph) as may be expected by the PR push of a new service. Nothing significant elsewhere amongst reliable and trustworthy publications. Article created and contributed to entirely by SPA COI. Rayman60 (talk) 01:17, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - 14 references of which 6 are blogs or profiles. 2 are invalid links. Fails WP:CORP. Even though I am a new editor, I feel this is poorly written and extremely promotional. Geymarfan (talk) 01:24, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:12, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:12, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.