The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus that NACTOR (and by a slightly smaller majority, GNG) are met Nosebagbear (talk) 22:43, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sofia Hublitz[edit]

Sofia Hublitz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD, doesn't meet WP:NACTOR, WP:GNG requirements, There are G-hits but most are just repeats of each other. SanAnMan (talk) 19:20, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SanAnMan (talk) 19:20, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Additional comments to votes: Yes, this person has hits on searches, but the large majority of them are from tabloid celebrity articles that have little significance or actually provide any significant coverage other than subjects like "who is this person dating" or "how tall is this person". Being a contestant on a reality show (MasterChef Junior in this case) is rarely ever significant enough to meet GNG; very few reality contestants meet GNG requirements. Her one main significance is on the one television series, Ozark. I'm not disputing that she has some level of fame, but to me the stringent requirements of GNG/NACTOR just don't seem to be met. NACTOR states: "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." This person has not meet that criteria.- SanAnMan (talk) 15:57, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:39, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:43, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Fails NACTOR. VV 19:58, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• keep seems to be ample internet content to satisfy GNG, notably the Daiy Express articles, Washington Independent, Issue magazine, &c. It's not really credible to claim that GNG is not met. Her role in Ozark, and 2+ million hits on the article here nominated for deletion suggests she has a following, or, at least, many people interested in her, both going a very long way to fulfiling NACTOR. Bluntly, it makes no sense to delete articles for which we have evidence of great demand - https://pageviews.toolforge.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&range=all-time&pages=Sofia_Hublitz --Tagishsimon (talk) 21:00, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• keep I believe this article adds significant value to Wikipedia and should be protected, so as not to devalue Wikipedia's content.James Kevin McMahon (talk) 09:49, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Tagishsimon. --Rosiestep (talk) 12:32, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: I can see a case for WP:TOOSOON but being (what I'm assuming to be) the main character of a major studio television series and a prominent contestant on MasterChef Junior should be grounds for WP:NACTOR. I'm on the fence about WP:GNG because I see coverage but they're not coming from like *great* sources, so I will need to do more research there. — BriefEdits (talk) 03:18, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• KeepThe show is a highly acclaimed sensation relative to most TV shows, and she's one of the main characters alongside multiple A-List actors. Secondary-source coverage is substantial to put it lightly. The show has been on for 4 years which I think undermines any Too Soon claims. I think some of the other roles count as significant (multiple-episode speaking parts in major series), though not to the level of Ozark. I'd say the extreme notability of the Ozark role counterbalances (and then some) the relatively low notability of other roles. I also think there should be some consideration of a person's age. If she were 40 and had had one major role at 20, that'd be one thing, but it seems likely there will be continued career notability. I don't think this one is on the fence, but let's see what others say. JWilliams835 (talk) 02:07, 10 June 2021 (UTC)JWilliams835 (talk) 02:07, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.