The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:58, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sofia Richie[edit]

Sofia Richie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural nomination. Subject's notability has been questioned. Adam9007 (talk) 00:25, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Sofia Richie herself does not pass any notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:04, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:11, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:11, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:11, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Lionel Richie#Family and salt this Article was thin to begin with, but has now turned into an attack venue on the subject based on tabloid junk, who does not have enough yet to have an article broken out from her father's. Nate • (chatter) 06:07, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm convinced per Tenbrae and FourViolas; I change my rationale to delete, but will stand by the salting of the title (without prejudice to re-creation if she reaches WP:N) as it'll inevitably be re-created with more tabloid junk and name-calling thrown at the subject knowing a certain fanbase and their anger that they caused their idol to remove a web presence. Nate • (chatter) 23:43, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOTINHERITED. I'm not sure why we would even want to redirect to Lionel Ritchie#Family since we don't do that for other non-notable children of famous people. --Tenebrae (talk) 16:33, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete She is not a WP:LPI, as she's given interviews to Teen Vogue, E! Online, and some other sources. But there's no substantive treatment in any source reliable enough for WP:BLPSOURCES, so WP:GNG fails. FourViolas (talk) 04:09, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fine with salting it per Nate, but with an expiration date of a year or two at most. It seems likely she'll cross the GNG threshold within a few years with some mainstream coverage, and the certain fanbase's ire will fade soon enough. FourViolas (talk) 06:18, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just modified my rationale a little; I have no issue with re-creation once good sourcing and sane profiles come in for the subject if they earn true notability, but keep it frozen for now. Nate • (chatter) 08:03, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete due to WP:NOTINHERITED and WP:N#TEMP, I agree with Tenebrae. I proposed a speedy deletion before but it got removed. I don't see Sofia Richie meeting any of the requirements for notability. AjayTO (talk) 23:19, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.