The result was delete. Fritzpoll (talk) 10:01, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This article reads like an advertisement, and relies primarily on its own website for sources. Further, it seems all the external links are to Softbrands websites (seems like spam) and the already-existing orphan tags are a sign that this article was added for advertising purposes only. I do not see anything encyclopedic or particularly noteworthy about this topic. Also, as the primary editor of this article is a Softbrands employee, one can clearly see how this violates WP:COI. How can there be any doubt this is being used solely for advertising? Timneu22 (talk) 10:14, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]