The result was keep. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 19:46, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
the article subject is virtually the same as fast ion conductor which is a more substantial article. Solid-state ionics appears to only exist for the purpose of plugging The Asian Society for Solid State Ionics. I would have no problem with a properly referenced article on this society, but doing it by a back-door fork is not good. SpinningSpark 22:01, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
*Keep and consider a merge,(see below) The term is in fact used generally. Cf. Solid State Ionics, published by Elsevier, and having nothing whatever to do with the Asian Society for SSI. [1], andthe 300 or so books in WorldCat with that phrase [2] I am not sure whether there is an actual distinction between this term and "fast ion conductors". If they are true synonyms, since WorldCat shows 131 books with the title Fast ion conductors [3] , I am not sure which of the two is the more standard term. DGG (talk) 19:59, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]