The result was Withdrawn by nominator. NAC—S Marshall Talk/Cont 22:23, 23 August 2009 (UTC) [reply]
Nominated for deletion per WP:DICT. Please expand the article (if possible) so that it is encyclopedic, and remove this afd when it is completed. <3 bunny 05:27, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The nominator and SlamDiego are both focusing on the current state of the article, which is an egregious failure to comply with WP:BEFORE. At AfD, our role is to evaluate the article's potential state. It is not appropriate to nominate something for AfD to try to force someone else to do a lot of work bringing the article up to scratch. Improve it yourself instead.
Therefore I recommend a snow closure as a nomination that fails WP:BEFORE and WP:PRESERVE.—S Marshall Talk/Cont 09:10, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"Delete" is only an appropriate outcome if this title should be a redlink. However, even if this article is only a dictionary definition, it should become a soft redirect to Wiktionary. You see, Wikipedia is not a dictionary, but our sister project Wiktionary is, and the convention is that we direct users to Wiktionary whenever a dictionary definition is needed.
A soft redirect to Wiktionary is technically a variant of a "keep" outcome at AfD.
In this case I am convinced that an encyclopaedic article could be written, and I am also sure that a soft redirect to wiktionary would be appropriate until such an article exists.
On thinking about this some more, I shall boldly create the soft redirect now; revert me if you disagree.—S Marshall Talk/Cont 22:02, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]