The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 00:18, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Soroosh Abdi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. Looked at it about 8 times. Half the sources don't mention him. Can't see how he passes WP:BIO. Not notable. scope_creep (talk) 21:58, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:20, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:20, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:20, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete sports agents are not often going to be notable for our purposes except for the "star" agents. Based on what I see in the article as well as reliable sources in Gnews, we don't see to have enough significant coverage, where he's the focus of the piece. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:24, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 22:22, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of passing WP:GNG Spiderone 22:24, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 19:24, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails my standards for lawyers -- admitted in 2014 and only practiced two years before quitting and did not meet any of my factors -- and that of the consensus. Sports agents are run of the mill except for those who are "stars". Bearian (talk) 19:02, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG, no real discussion of him in the sources provided. Fenix down (talk) 09:56, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nom. Cannot find reliable sourcing to satisfy WP:GNG. GauchoDude (talk) 13:11, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.