The result was delete. Courcelles 05:38, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've just declined this as speedyspam. However, it doesn't appear to be notable. As A7 doesn't apply to software, I'm bringing it to AfD GedUK 19:59, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm confused as to why this is being considered for deletion. As I explained on the articles discussion page (to protest the speedy deletion), the article is up to standards. It provides a clear concise history of the program, compares the program to similar programs in a neutral manner, etcetera. In no way does the article advertise or compare itself in such a way that would indicate superiority. If you could point out specific sections that are troubling I will be happy to rewrite them. SZoo (talk) 22:41, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I removed content from and reformatted the Features and flaws section to remove content that could be taken as an ad-like comparison. SZoo (talk) 00:48, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]