The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. plicit 01:33, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Southeast Face (Clyde Minaret)[edit]

Southeast Face (Clyde Minaret) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Similarly to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Ridge (Wolf's Head), which was just closed as delete, this climbing route is not independently notable from Clyde Minaret, which it is on. Does not meet WP:GNG and content should be deleted or merged. —Ganesha811 (talk) 01:09, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I see several articles on Fifty Classic Climbs of North America that have no content beyond noting their existence and inclusion in this book. None of them establish notability independent from the mountains themselves. Reywas92Talk 15:04, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.