The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Spidercide (comics). Result is delete but the title then becomes a valid redirect to Spidercide (comics) :) ·Salvidrim!· ✉ 15:18, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Spidercide[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced orphan that has never been seriously edited. Spidey104 00:22, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 June 11. Snotbot t • c » 00:49, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find any reliable sources. That said, given what I can find in non-reliable sources I strongly suspect there were magazine reviews of the game at one point. I'd lean toward keeping this on the less-than-popular "sources likely exist" argument, but can't provide a bolded !vote due to the lack of reliable sources. Hobit (talk) 13:23, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Theopolisme (talk) 02:08, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I believe Hobit's comment about being unable to find reliable sources supports the need to delete this article. Spidey104 03:33, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 04:00, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete doesn't even try to assert notability aside from having once appeared in a Radio Shack catalog, and even that is unreferenced. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:20, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment a pesticide designed to kill spiders would be an arachnicide, which might be a legitimate topic. Barney the barney barney (talk) 20:11, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Arachnicide currently redirects to arachnid. If it is ever developed into a full article of its own spidercide could be made into a redirect to that article. For now I think it should just be deleted. Spidey104 00:43, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Spidercide (comics) - lack of notability per above. Ansh666 02:46, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.