The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 15:16, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spike and Tyke (characters)[edit]

Spike and Tyke (characters) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing any in-depth coverage, seems to fail NFICTION/GNG. Effectively unreferenced (PLOT+media apperances), BEFORE fails to show any in-depth analysis. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:17, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:17, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comments and animation-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs (talk) 18:28, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
None of them are about plot at all. Did you look at them? Toonopedia is entirely real-world -- the dates and titles of cartoons in the series, when they moved beyond being bit players to their own solo cartoons, how they were used in comics, and how they informed the creation of another set of characters. The Encyclopedia of Animated Cartoons has information on the dates, titles and voices for the theatrical cartoons, and their inclusion in later television shows. American Funny Animal Comics in the 20th Century has information on their appearances in the comic strip and solo comic books, including differences between their characterizations in the cartoons and the comics. The Great Cartoon Directors and Of Mice and Magic have similar kinds of coverage. I don't think there's an in-universe word in any of them; I can't imagine why you think they fail WP:PLOT. -- Toughpigs (talk) 22:01, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting because more sources have been added to the article. Please take a look and we'll review as more comments come in. Thanks everyone for your participation and assuming good faith!
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 16:24, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.