The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (non-admin closure). Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:51, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sport Clube da Catumbela[edit]

AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/Sport Clube da Catumbela

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The club does not currently and never before existed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Valmir144 (talk • contribs) 09:52, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Struway2 (talk) 08:45, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I'm not sure how the nominator can in good faith claim this club never existed. The article states it won the Angola championship in both 1945 and 1958, and cites the reliable source RSSSF. As to notability, any football club playing or having played (notability is not temporary) at the top national level in its country is considered notable, this one won the national championship, twice. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 08:45, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per Struway, club has won a national championship, is notable per WP:FOOTYN with a nod to WP:NTEMP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fenix down (talk • contribs) 08:49, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - as above; needs improving, not deleting. Giant Snowman 17:40, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Struway and this.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:45, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 August 8. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:03, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 21:11, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 21:11, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, as above. Egsan Bacon (talk) 03:02, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.