The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus to delete, but please cite a source. W.marsh 23:38, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sporting Life (US sports journal)[edit]

Not notable. Only notable thing is that it shared the same name as a paper in the UK that made it. MECU≈talk 17:14, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep An historic periodical publication that ran for over 25 years is worthy of an article. --Oakshade 00:25, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Daniel.Bryant ^{[ T · C ]} 06:19, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Oakshade. -- Bpmullins | Talk 20:13, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no references, no external links, no assertion of notability, no information. Chondrite 20:42, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.