The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 03:48, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SquarO[edit]

SquarO (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This article is advertising promotion of puzzle just some guy off the street came up with and nobody in the real world knows or cares about. No notability of puzzle attempted to be established, no reliable sources for anything. First ref goes to a link page that doesn't exist (and the page that replaced it is just a long listing of links -- fails the "nontrivial" coverage for a source -- and I don't even see SquarO on the new version of the links page of that site from browsing first bunch of link pages. Second ref is just the personal site of the guy who came up with it. I should also note that an editor removed the prod while giving no reason to do so. This editor has a history of such behavior. An admin should probably look into his actions since it appears to be an ongoing problem. DreamGuy (talk) 14:06, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 14:38, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22SquarO%22+%22Marc+Lebel%22&btnG=Search For a flash game, that isn't a lot of hits, and I don't see any legitimate review sites in that mix. And having just played the game, it is exactly like minesweeper, keeping the logic solving where you use the numbers, only all the numbers are reviewed. An interesting way of doing things. Dream Focus 16:07, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Lacks notability. --Sloane (talk) 17:19, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.