The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 07:49, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I love this site myself, but it’s not notable enough for Wikipedia as it’s only got primary sources and am not sure if we can find good secondary sources. SportingFlyertalk 17:08, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is a lot of reference "to it" but no reliable secondary independent references "about it" that I can find. It looks likes it should be notable but no.... Aoziwe (talk) 10:54, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am another person who loves the use of the site but its not really notable in terms of secondary sources for this to stay as an article here. Not Homura (talk) 12:18, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.